November 11, 2003
THANKS A LOT, WTO....A few years ago we had a little spat with
the EU over the taxation of multinational corporations. The case went
to the WTO, we lost, and Congress then took up the task of fixing our
tax laws to comply with the WTO ruling.
The result, in retrospect, was predictable given the way Republicans
react to just about everything these days: in what way, they asked
themselves, can this problem be turned into a way to help out all of our
big corporate donors?
The answer was pretty simple: craft a bill that ends the tax break as mandated by the WTO, but replaces it with a laundry list of tax breaks worth twice as much for favored industries. In other words, a technical dispute with Europe was swiftly turned into an excuse to continue the Republican tax cut jihad. What a surprise.
Now the WTO has struck again,
ruling that George Bush's Pennsylvania And West Virginia Vote
Protection Act of 2002, aka steel tariffs, violates international trade
law. Normally this would be good news, since the steel tariffs were bad
policy, but I think I'll wait for the other shoe to drop before I
breathe a sigh of relief. After all, how long do you think it will take
for this to be used as an excuse to enact yet another bevy of corporate
welfare handouts? And this time maybe they'll be able to do it right
and shovel a bunch of taxpayer dough to both the steel industry and the steel consumers, who were so unhappy with the tariffs in the first place.
My guess: the tariffs will go, but a few weeks later they'll get
replaced with something a bit more subtle and far ranging. Watch the
legislative calendar closely....
Posted by Kevin Drum at November 11, 2003 02:30 PM
you are wise. prepare for cynical pension overhaul, or new additions via conference committee to the energy bill.
I dunno. I can't think of any Republican interest group that favored
the tarriffs -- they were a sop to a swing group that probably won't
vote for GWB in '04 anyway. Hopefully we'll just scrap 'em (the
tarriffs, not the swing group) and call it a day.
But I could be wrong.
See, Kevin, this is why we like you - insightful commentary that
reveals to us things we may not have already known, based on evidence
and facts. Stuff like this is what sets you apart. Please stick to this
and not working to re-elect Bush by making baseless, speculative attacks
on a Democratic front-runner.
The WTO has been more trouble than it's been worth, it seems, but of
course there's no real thought of abandoning it. I am all for protecting
steel workers, but the WTO doesn't care much for American labor.
Well, in fairness, the WTO isn't supposed to care about American
labor. It's supposed to care about enforcing the rules. (Whether it
does so wisely is another question, of course.)
Steel tarriffs going? Good!
I believe there are a bunch of sugar growers in Florida who vote Republican and love tariffs.
As a new reader, I'm afraid I can't make out your tone, Kevin.
Are you saying tariffs were bad, and thanks for pointing it out, WTO?
Or that BushCo. will only make things worse, so please don't poke the hornet's nest?
They don't grow steel, do they Rob?
Sorry read your post wrong-missed a "the"
Niall: both. I couldn't make up my mind.
Pennsylvania And West Virginia Vote Protection Act of 2002?!
Is this really the name of the thing?
I wonder what that means? He's protecting the potential vote? As much as
I despise him, Fake President Bush is a master of the incomprehesible,
ass-backwards act-name. He should get together with Quentin Tarantino.
Free trade is always great when you don't have to live with the
consequences of it. Steel plants in most undeveloped nations pay their
workers next-to-nothing and could care less about pollution and what it
does to the local population. Multinationals (including those with auto
plants in the US) don't care about where the steel comes from just so
long as it is cheap. Too bad we'll also have to wipe out the pensions of
workers who have put 30+ years into a basic American industry. I'd
write more but I need to run out to my local WalMart and wipe out more
I can imagine that the uberparanoid republican set (cheney, et al)
might rationalize propping up the steel industry out of tactical
concern--presumably out of fear of not being able to count on any other
steel-producing imports when the proverbial and ever-impending (I didn't
say imminent) shit hits the fan.
Maybe if mommy hadn't been so cold and detached..........
Well, we could easily bring back those manufacturing jobs. Just use
the pre-emptive doctrine to lay waste to most of the developed and
developing world. This will leave us with nearly all the world's
available capital plant, just like 1945. Ozzie and Harriet could come
back. Who can argue this is not in our national interests? If you want
to talk about "imminent threat" this is the grand-daddy of them all.
On the other hand, we could take a deep breath and get beyond the
blame game for "loss of jobs overseas", and tackle this issue seriously.
Absent the logical extension of the bush "doctrine" alluded to above,
what can we do?
From a Wall Street Journal article last week:
"Unless the Administration drops the illegal [steel] tariffs, the
EU will slap tariffs of its own on more than $2 billion of US exports by
in reaction to other illegal US export subsidies (per the WTO),
called foreign sales coroporation tax breaks (FSC's), the EU is expected
to impose 5% tariffs beginning in March on $4 billion of US exports to
Europe. Products affected are agricultural goods, paper products,
cutlery, clothing, citrus...The tariff rate will rise by one percentage point a month to a maximum of 17%.
The article hints that the Admin. might find the WTO ruling useful as political cover for repealing the tariffs and subsidies.
This "cover" is what's known as "insulation" from domestic political
pressures among globalization advocates, and antidemocratic measures
among the anti-globo crowd.
i think there was a robert reich article just recently that discussed
how china's losing manufacturing jobs just as fast as we are, because
manufacturing jobs are simply becoming more scarce as people are
replaced with machines. couldn't find it on first google search. maybe
i should talk to a librarian........
Is this the Reich article you were talking about?
I think that the Bush admin was pandering on too short of a time
scale. When Bush began his war rumblings about Iraq, I was sure that
he'd 'allow' himself to be delayed until the fall of '03 (since Saddam
was sure to be relatively uncooperative, the longer Bush waited, the
easier it would be to deflect the charge that he hadn't tried to work
with the UN)...
I was wrong. But, in another way, I was right- he should've waited.
Saddam would've been no more dangerous this year than he was last year.
Whether it was the mid-term elections, or whether he just completely
misunderestimated the longer-term results (thinking that things would go
so well he'd be ever-more-popular), he screwed the pooch. Maybe he
didnt understand that his 9/11 bounce was a bounce, not
Here, again, Bush would've been well-served, in an *obviously* political
act, to wait until right about now to install the tariffs. They
would've stayed tied up in the WTO until after the election...
Maybe he was hoping that the bad press about the tariffs would've
faded by now, while the swing voters in those swing states would
remember his porcine generosity... in which case, he again badly
misunderestimated the situation, and his opponents (the EU, this time).
The beautiful thing now, IMO, is that he's screwed either way. If he
goes to the mat with the Euros, it's bad and ugly. If he gives up the
tariffs, he just pisses off the very swing voters he was trying to buy
in the first place. Probably worse than if he'd just left well enough
In my constant search for politicians and party platforms that I can
support I must ask, do any of the current candidates for President
support the repeal of these tariffs other than to comply with WTO rules?
The WTO is the perfect foil for the Republican/isolationist/black
helicopter crowd. If they don't want to have the WTO, they'll have to
withdraw from the GATT. The WTO was designed to enforce the GATT. If
they don't want the GATT, then they should prepare themselves for more
than a few trade wars.
As far as I can tell, if you're a free trader, the only pony we've got in the race is Clark.
The political insulation theory is interesting; the only danger i can
foresee for Bush politically is that he risks looking like he's caving
to the Euros. Get ready for a lot of hilarious and tortured Neville
You have a pretty nice blog. English is not my native language but it
was please to read your site. From Russia with love :)Sincerely yours..
8444 You can buy viagra from this site :http://www.ed.greatnow.com
5875 Why is Texas holdem so darn popular all the sudden?
1335 ok you can play online poker at this address : http://www.play-online-poker.greatnow.com
Is it true or not? Could the pill work for me? Get more information!
Inform about possible penis enlargement exercises
Read the truth about penis enlargement pills
For webmaster: if you consider that the comment is unapropiate I'm sorry
and please remove it from your database. Contact me at
8800 get cialis online from this site http://www.cialis.owns1.com
7890 Keep it up! Try Viagra once and youll see. http://viagra.levitra-i.com
Wow, I was just saying the same thing to my friend last night. Thanks for posting this!
1607 Get your online poker fix at http://www.onlinepoker-dot.com
Excellent site. Keep up the good work.
http://www.mapau-online.biz http://www.c-online-casino.co.uk http://www.cd-online-casino.co.uk
634 black jack is hot hot hot! get your blackjack at http://www.blackjack-dot.com
Thanks for the post. It was very inspirational.
2827 check out the hot blackjack at http://www.blackjack-p.com here
you can play blackjack online all you want! So everyone ~SMURKLE~
2112 Herie http://blaja.web-cialis.com is online for all your black jack needs. We also have your blackjack needs met as well ;-)
credit cards uk are cool http://credit-cards.order.gb.com 25.08. 2004 14:25:59 and I also like Car hire at http://car-hire.order.gb.com and Diecast http://diecast.order.gb.com and 25.08. 2004 14:25:59 Dating http://dating.order.gb.com and Car Insurance http://car-insurance.order.gb.com 25.08. 2004 14:25:59