Contact
Archives
Search
Blogs
Newspaper Blogs
English-Language
Press
Polls

July 26, 2003

FLOODING THE ZONE....Matt Yglesias thinks it's odd that the usual crew of New York Times bashers are oddly uninterested in the fact that during the runup to war Judith Miller hyped WMD stories endlessly and has turned out to be completely wrong. Why, one might even conclude that Miller was flooding the zone with this stuff simply as a personal vendetta, rather than doing her job as an objective reporter.

Matt is too gentlemanly to name names, but presumably he's talking about blogosphere stars Glenn, Andrew, and Mickey, who have indeed pretty much ignored Miller's obsessive reporting. Shouldn't they be calling for her resignation?

Posted by Kevin Drum at July 26, 2003 03:30 PM | TrackBack


Comments

Kevin Kevin Kevin. We all know that conservatives have a CLEAR and PERFECT view. They do not allow facts to cloud their moral imperative.

Posted by: M. L. Foster at July 26, 2003 03:36 PM | PERMALINK

This lack of consistency is why Republicans have no credibility.

Posted by: Mike at July 26, 2003 03:45 PM | PERMALINK

Alterman caught it: It's all about working the refs. If the refs are already on your side, why harass them?
I doubt that conservatives were giving much hell to MoDo when she was ripping Clinton, either.

Posted by: PG at July 26, 2003 03:46 PM | PERMALINK

Boy the way Glen Miller played
Songs that made the hit parade.
Guys like us we had it made,
Those were the days.

And you knew who you were then,
Girls were girls and men were men,
Mister we could use a man like Herbert Hoover again.

Didn’t need no welfare state.
Everybody pulled his weight.
Gee our old LaSalle ran great.
Those were the days.

Posted by: Archie & Edith at July 26, 2003 03:54 PM | PERMALINK

It has been fairly obvious for some time that the NYT made an unholy fuss about the wrong liar. Jayson Blair was a flyspeck. Judy Miller is a 100 ton gorilla. And Jeff Gerth is another one.

Yet their jobs are safe and sound.

Posted by: David Ehrenstein at July 26, 2003 03:56 PM | PERMALINK

I'm missing the point here. She was wrong. So are a lot of people a lot of the time. That's not a big deal. If what you are saying is her being incorrect (jury still out BTW) is the same as an editor pushing an editorial position on the journalism pages and denying doing so, that dog won't hunt.

Speaking for myself, I don't expect anything close to perfection from anybody, especially journalists. That's why reading/watching/listening to multiple news sources is critical.

The NYT had, and has, and I hope will always have, a very rich, very partisan editorial page. God bless'em for it.

If the NYT wishes to, as it has had, and has today, partisan news (as opposed to editorial)pages, I'm fine with that too. But having partisan news pages AND declaring objectivity is a problem IMHO.

BTW, I think I have seen some difference since Raines left.

Posted by: spc67 at July 26, 2003 03:58 PM | PERMALINK

spc67, it has been amply demonstrated that she's been nothing more than the NYT mouthpiece for Chalabi. That's not reporting, that's a PR outfit.

Posted by: Melanie at July 26, 2003 04:06 PM | PERMALINK

And that would make her different from CNN and the BBC and Saddam's regime?

Posted by: Sebastian Holsclaw at July 26, 2003 04:10 PM | PERMALINK

spc67...

Jack Shafer's piece in Slate --that's what got Yglesias talking -- is long, detailed, and pretty devastating. Check it out.

Posted by: Harley at July 26, 2003 04:14 PM | PERMALINK

Curious that Fox News slipped Sebastian's mind in his little list. These oversights happen.
Some nice stuff in this thread (and some rubbish): it's good to see Archie & Edith cited, and here's a shout out for Herbert Hoover.
Kevin, maybe Miller did have a vendetta against Saddam Hussein (a personal grudge she was pursuing), but I guess you mean campaign.

Posted by: John Isbell at July 26, 2003 04:17 PM | PERMALINK

She wrote a book about Saddam's WMD. She had to find WMD to confirm her book and confirm all the shaky reporting she had done. See how one lie is piled onto the first one? It's like somebody lying on their resume and the story gets bigger and bigger as the years go on. It starts out as a little lie.

Just guessing, but these could be reasons a reporter could lean one way or the other.

Again, if she, or Bush, were considering the facts objectively, the evidence would have pointed first and foremost to an effort to fake these stories and get the US into a war with Iraq.

Posted by: Eric M at July 26, 2003 04:26 PM | PERMALINK

Jack Shafer's piece in Slate --that's what got Yglesias talking -- is long, detailed, and pretty devastating. Check it out.

Thanks, going and doing.

Posted by: spc67 at July 26, 2003 04:30 PM | PERMALINK

AUTHOR: WillieStyle
EMAIL: ookusaga@alumni.princeton.edu
IP: 68.48.118.44
URL:
DATE: 07/26/2003 04:31:14 PM

Posted by: WillieStyle at July 26, 2003 04:31 PM | PERMALINK

And that would make her different from CNN and the BBC and Saddam's regime?

Yes.

[Preview is your friend]

Posted by: WillieStyle at July 26, 2003 04:32 PM | PERMALINK

Jack Shafer's piece in Slate --that's what got Yglesias talking -- is long, detailed, and pretty devastating. Check it out.

Ok, I read the piece. It is pretty compelling. If people want to call for her resignation after the remedial suggested steps are taken, then I have no problem with that. If a reporter can't tell whether their contacts are reliable, then that lack of judgement bespeaks a competency issue.

But the Raines issue was one of intent (at least in my mind), not competence. Raines' shaping of the news was not because he was making mistakes, but exactly the opposite, he was successfully pushing an agenda.

One can support the firing of Raines without calling for Miller's resignation and be consistent. But for me, that Slate article says either she's proven right in the end, or she's not a good enough reporter to work for the NYT.

Posted by: spc67 at July 26, 2003 04:46 PM | PERMALINK

spc67,

To me, Miller's real sin was to single-source her data acquisition over and over and over from a source that a priori would be suspect to a 12-year-old writing for the school newspaper.

And that's not to insult 12-year-old reporters. Keep up the good work, guys, just don't emulate Judith!

Posted by: dasboat at July 26, 2003 04:56 PM | PERMALINK

What's wrong with you people? Haven't you ever heard of enterprise reporting?

I mean, how many reporters would have the chutzpah to comandeer their own Army unit in pursuit of the story? I mean, even Ernie Pyle never comandeered an Army unit.

What's wrong with talking to Chalabi? While all those other reporters were wasting their time talking to grunts about how much they missed their girlfriends, she went to the horse's mouth. You can call it uncritical sucking up to someone who's motives may be questionable, but I call that getting the exclusive, treading where others fear to go.

And Shafer? He's one to talk. He never left Seattle, or wherever the hell he's based. It's easy to sit and drink lattes and pass judgment on someone who can't defend herself because, like the Mathew Modine character in that Kubrick flick, she decided to "get in the shit."

Go ahead and criticize. Go ahead and think of her as an unprincipled partisan hack who's violated every modern jounalistic principle. It doesn't matter, because Judy doesn't have time for such idle chatter. She's a truthseeker, and truthseekers don't look for the truth behind a desk.

Posted by: Sven at July 26, 2003 04:57 PM | PERMALINK

Great post, Kevin.

Melanie has it: she was just Ahmed Chalabi’s press agent. Remember the scene with the anonymous Chalabi-supplied "scientist" pointing at various WMD sites in the sand?

Even without the assistance of Glenn, Andrew (a/k/a Laura B.’s #1 rival), and Mickey, I think her days be numbered.

Posted by: Andrew Lazarus at July 26, 2003 04:59 PM | PERMALINK

Oh I think it was Laurie Mylorie who wrote the book about Saddam's WMD.

Posted by: Eric M at July 26, 2003 05:38 PM | PERMALINK

I wonder why Judith Miller hyped WMD stories endlessly and has turned out to be completely wrong.

I see from the body and soul weblog that million George Soros along with MoveOn.com is running full page newspaper ads.

George Soros has been reading Billmon. He will be running full page ads in the New York Times the St. Louis Dispatch, and the Houston Chronicle tomorrow with a list of a dozen Bush administration lies about the war. You can download a copy of the ad -- headlined WHEN THE NATION GOES TO WAR, THE PEOPLE DESERVE THE TRUTH

We keep pushing for that investigation and I don't thnk Bush or Cheney will be in the running come 2004.

Posted by: Cheryl at July 26, 2003 05:39 PM | PERMALINK

er sorry that should be

I wonder why Judith Miller hyped WMD stories that have turned out to be completely wrong.

And I also wonder why the Republicans thinks that no one is noticing when they insert the work WMD "programs" into what we expect to find in Iraq. David Brook's did this last night in PBS Newshour and Mark Shields didn't say a single word about it?

Posted by: Cheryl at July 26, 2003 05:43 PM | PERMALINK

Sven's kidding, right? No? Yes?

Posted by: harley at July 26, 2003 05:47 PM | PERMALINK

Cheryl,

And now we get Brooks on the NYT op-ed page twice a week....so they won't have to worry about being accused of liberal bias. Geesh.

Posted by: harley at July 26, 2003 05:56 PM | PERMALINK

Here's a helping hand:

Mickey Kaus (one of five) - http://slate.msn.com/id/2084815/

Glenn Reynolds - http://www.instapundit.com/archives/010286.php

Andrew Sullivan - not searchable (sorry)

So maybe the criticism is unjustified?

Just askin'

bob

Posted by: bob at July 26, 2003 06:49 PM | PERMALINK

One can support the firing of Raines without calling for Miller's resignation and be consistent

One can also do a neck bridge and balance a wine glass full of battery acid on his belly, but that doesn't mean he has thought through his position.

shaping of the news was not because he was making mistakes, but exactly the opposite, he was successfully pushing an agenda

Do you guys ever listen to yourself, supporters of a president whose White House confesses to watching only Fox?

Posted by: Demetrios at July 26, 2003 07:01 PM | PERMALINK

Demetrios,

As God is my witness, I haven't the foggiest idea what you are, or are not, or may be, trying to say.

Posted by: spc67 at July 26, 2003 07:06 PM | PERMALINK

Bob,

You'll notice that Kevin wrote that the trinity has "pretty much ignored Miller's obsessive reporting," not that they totally ignored it. Besides, you found only two examples and neither of them indicates any concern over Miller's reporting (the Kaus example you cite criticized Howard Kurtz, not Miller), so, yes, the criticism of them is still justified. Kaus and Sully have conducted a holy war against the NY Times for a loooong time, so their silence on Miller is telling.

Posted by: Jim E. at July 26, 2003 07:31 PM | PERMALINK

Bob, the Instapundit story was about the appropriateness of herbehavior. He didn’t get around to mentioning that her stories are mostly B.S.

Posted by: Andrew Lazarus at July 26, 2003 08:49 PM | PERMALINK

Glenn also managed to somehow completely miss making any judgment whatsoever or (using his favorite trick) linking to a bunch of articles that stridently denounce her while saying "Indeed". All of a sudden he's Mr. "Just Presenting the Facts" when it's inconvenient.

Posted by: jesse at July 26, 2003 11:23 PM | PERMALINK

Anyone hungry for more Miller-bashing, by the way, should start here.

Shafer missed my favorite part of Miller's latest article -- quoting a military officer as calling her faux scientist a "turning point" for the WMD search team she was with. What Miller leaves out is that the team's search effort was cut short (and the team told to leave Iraq) just days after she wrote her April story.

(Note: The post cited above is the same one Atrios linked to a week ago, so if you read it then, you won't find anything new.)

Posted by: Swopa at July 27, 2003 12:43 AM | PERMALINK

"Andrew Sullivan - not searchable (sorry)"

LOL!

Posted by: David Ehrenstein at July 27, 2003 07:09 AM | PERMALINK

"I'm missing the point here"...."I haven't the foggiest idea".

I'm starting to see a pattern here. Some people really are taking a chance when they play dumb. Sven too.

Posted by: zizka at July 27, 2003 07:21 AM | PERMALINK

As God is my witness, I haven't the foggiest idea what you are, or are not, or may be, trying to say.

he was successfully pushing an agenda

White House confesses to watching only Fox

Try to put it together. I've put the key words in bold for you. God is infinitely patient and can wait for you to connect the dots. She can also wait for conservatives to include right-wing propaganda channels in their decidedly un-ecumenical method for media criticism; don't worry, She's got all day.

Posted by: Demetrios at July 27, 2003 08:03 AM | PERMALINK

OK,

I had given you the benefit of ther doubt earlier and decided you couldn't really be trying to make such a ridiculous analogy. Alas, you've proven me wrong.

Posted by: spc67 at July 27, 2003 08:47 AM | PERMALINK

spc67, this is how you defined the issue yourself: But the Raines issue was one of intent (at least in my mind), not competence.

Sorry, I was just trying to apply your own stated standard to a separate situation to see how "consistent" you were. An "intent" to have an "agenda" seems like a pretty serious thing; don't you think, if we're going to ferret out "intents" to have "agendas" at the NYT, we should ferret equally and consistently? No? You're not really a media critic, just an idealogue?

Anyway, I notice that you don't actually provide a critique of what I'm saying. But thanks for giving me "the benefit of the doubt".

Posted by: Demetrios at July 27, 2003 09:20 AM | PERMALINK

The correct analogy would be if you could find "intent" in Miller's work. Nobody has done that.

The ridiculousness of an analogy between politics and journalism remains. The objectives, practices, goals etc. of the two fields are not related.

I am happy to draw analogies within given fields of endeavor and frequently do so. I don't generally try to draw serious analogies between say manufacturing computers and college hockey.

I am certainly not a media critic (at least not a professional one), nor am I an ideologue (though I do have strongly held beliefs, you'd struggle to categorize the mish-mash). But I can recognize less than compelling thinking.

Posted by: spc67 at July 27, 2003 09:30 AM | PERMALINK

spc67, please read this and let me know if it addresses your concerns about the "'intent' in Miller's work."

She told the Army unit she was traveling with what to investigate, and when higher-ups ordered the unit to shut down its efforts, she threatened them. That's not just inept reporting; it's jounalistic megalomania ... in pursuit of an agenda.

Posted by: Swopa at July 27, 2003 09:54 AM | PERMALINK

The jury is still out on the subject of WMD. It seems to me that Right-Wing criticism of Judith Miller is pretty much on a par with Lefty criticism of Gephardt's plans for the Supreme Court when he becomes president.Didn't see much discussion of THAT on this forum. Everyone has their own perspective. Judith Miller is just a little less important than Gephardt.

And the management of the NY Times seemed to agree pretty much with what the Right was saying. Blair and Raines are gone, Bill Keller is executive editor and David Brooks has been hired.

Unless Andrew Sullivan and Glenn Reynolds constitute a force too powerful to resist?

Posted by: melk at July 27, 2003 10:27 AM | PERMALINK

Oooh, I was wrong that I was wrong! Judith Miller DID write a book citing Iraq's Bioweapons: "Germs" 1998. It pops up in this story about the late David Kelly.

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=427864

"Some have suggested Dr Kelly was an unworldly scientist led on by the reporters, but he was used to dealing with the media...

Among them was Judith Miller of the New York Times, the paper's WMD expert and the recipient of an e-mail on the day Dr Kelly died, in which he spoke of "dark actors playing games". In Germ, the 1998 book she co-wrote, she is fulsome in her praise for him as part of the "Gang of Four", the senior inspectors who forced so many admissions about WMD out of the Iraqis in the mid-1990s. More than anyone else, Dr Kelly was instrumental in getting the regime to admit the existence of its biological weapons programme."

re spc, she didn't have to lie to be a bad reporter. She could also be dumb, or an ideological fanatic. She could also could have not reported things that contradicted her earlier reporting, what's that, arrogance maybe.

Posted by: Eric M at July 27, 2003 10:36 AM | PERMALINK

Did anyone see Judith Miller on CNN last week? She's quite an angry character - has that same evil glint that say, James Woolsey has. Definitely seems like the type to hype up anything she can to start wars.

My favorite incidient is when Cheney kept citing Miller stories as "proof" of Iraq being a threat to the U.S., stories which were later attributed to Ahmad Chalabi. WaPo ripped her pretty good for that.

Posted by: killbill at July 27, 2003 10:48 AM | PERMALINK

spc67, please read this and let me know if it addresses your concerns about the "'intent' in Miller's work."

I did as you asked (thanks for the link!). It's damning in that she was overzealous and hamhanded in pursuit of a story certainly. But how are you divining "intent" here? Do you see a pro-war agenda? Please show me that. I see a reporter looking for "the big story." That's what the bold sections say to me. I'm NOT excusing her, simply still don't see the clarity of the analogy between her and Raines.

Posted by: spc67 at July 27, 2003 11:01 AM | PERMALINK

I'll just remind everyone that melk claimed to have just read the Geneva Convention (sic) and then lied about their contents in the thread here on that topic. Check it out. Hey melk, I'll be posting that whenever I see your name.

Posted by: John Isbell at July 27, 2003 12:24 PM | PERMALINK

The ridiculousness of an analogy between politics and journalism remains.

You're absolutely correct. Comparing the "intent" to have an "agenda" at Fox News vs. the NYT is like making an analogy between politics and journalism. I apologize for burdening you with less than compelling thinking.

Posted by: Demetrios at July 27, 2003 12:44 PM | PERMALINK

John Isbell:

Gotta hand it to you. I've been pulling that Geneva Conventions lie for years. Fooled everyone.
My mom, the trashman, even my urologist. Made a pretty penny running it.

Until now. You caught me. Obviously have to be careful around a sharp cookie like you.

Look. I would never have used that lie had I not stood to gain financially from it. And I have. In a big way. So I guess it was worth it.

Maybe not. It's STILL dishonest. But I appreciate your calling me on it. I'll try to be a better person from now on.

But, given that I lied about THAT, how do we know that this coming clean is genuine? Maybe I'm just being facetious? Maybe I'm just mocking you?

I just don't know anymore. That's the trouble with lying. It's a downward spiral of deceit.

You have a good day. Truthfully.

Posted by: melk at July 28, 2003 09:25 AM | PERMALINK

If you would be unloved and forgotten, be reasonable.

Posted by: Powers Dave at May 3, 2004 11:06 AM | PERMALINK

online casinos | casino bonus | casino directory | high roller casinos | casinos

Posted by: doi at May 24, 2004 06:31 AM | PERMALINK

Buy www.i-directv.net this it is a wonderful addition to anyones home entertainment system.

Posted by: directv at May 27, 2004 11:02 PM | PERMALINK

Find your www.ALL-FIORICET.COM here, 100% discrete!

Posted by: order fioricet at June 14, 2004 02:33 PM | PERMALINK

go to WWW.E-CREDIT-CARD-DEBT.COM for great deals!

Posted by: creditcard debt at June 15, 2004 09:22 AM | PERMALINK

Now you can Play Poker online any time!

Posted by: online poker at June 25, 2004 09:14 AM | PERMALINK

The world is a beautiful book for those who can read it.

Posted by: Saunders Patricia at June 30, 2004 11:38 AM | PERMALINK

you can play blackjack here! http://www.blackjack.greatnow.com

Posted by: blackjack at July 21, 2004 06:36 PM | PERMALINK


Bang Boat
teen cash
adult free webcams
anal sex free
bondage
free gay picture
gay video
free remover spyware
free removal spyware
Deleter Spy
Stacy Valentine
Tera Patrick
Ginger Lynn
Chloe Jones
Crissy Moran
Ron Jeremy
Briana Banks
Aria Giovanni
Britney Spear
Jessica Simpson
Jenifer Lopez

free web cam free live web cam free chat with web cam free sex web cam adult free web cam free nude web cam free girl web cam free web cam site free porn web cam free gay web cam free xxx web cam free teen web cam free web cam chat room free amateur web cam free web cam pic free adult live web cam free adult web cam chat live sex web cam free free personal web cam free live nude web cam free live girl web cam free live web cam chat web cam live free personal cam free view web free web cam picture free sex chat web cam free online web cam cam free viewing web free web cam software free lesbian web cam free web cam community cam free watch web free web cam video free live web cam site free web cam host free sexy web cam free web cam hosting free live web cam porn free naked web cam free web cam of woman free home web cam free live xxx web cam free adult web cam site free nude web cam chat cam free totally web cam free movie web cam chat free teen web free web cam chat site free asian web cam free black web cam voyeur web cam free free streaming web cam free web cam pussy free live teen web cam free web cam show free gay live web cam free private web cam cam free web yahoo web cam free ware cam chatting free web cam free gallery web free teen web cam pic free nude teen web cam free live web cam show free male web cam cam free live web woman cam free now web cam free membership no web cam college free web free live web cam amateur access cam free web cam dating free web free shemale web cam free sex web cam site cam free sample web cam download free web cam free room web cam free no registration web free adult web cam community free gay web cam chat cam chat free girl web cam free girl girl live web free hidden web cam free naked woman web cam free erotic web cam free hardcore web cam cam code display free web cam free mature web free web cam broadcast cam free preview web cam chat free online web free college girl web cam free live lesbian web cam cam free skin web free gay male web cam cam free man web free porn web cam chat cam free service web free nude woman web cam free web cam sex show free sex web cam video free adult sex web cam free online sex web cam free teen sex web cam free gay sex web cam free web cam sex amateur free private web cam sex home web cam sex free free web cam cyber sex free couple sex web cam free lesbian sex web cam free hardcore sex web cam cam free sex watch web free sex web cam pic cam free movie sex web cam free free sex web cam free sex view web free sex web cam sample free black sex web cam free nude web cam pic free amateur nude web cam cam free nude sexy web cam free non nude web free nude web cam site free adult nude web cam free nude man web cam free nude web cam show cam free live nude web woman free nude beach web cam free nude gay web cam free nude web cam at home free nude web cam picture cam free nude preview web cam free nude video web cam free girl hot web free web cam teen girl cam free girl pic web cam free girl online web black cam free girl web cam free girl watch web free adult girl web cam asian cam free girl web cam free girl video web cam free girl picture web cam free girl web young cam cam free free girl web web cam free girl totally web cam free girl show web cam free gallery girl web cam free girl real web cam free free girl web cam free live online web free live streaming web cam cam free live web free home live web cam cam free live secretfriends-com web cam free live totally web free live sexy web cam free live naked web cam cam free live watch web cam free live view web cam cam free free live web web cam feed free live web cam free live private web cam free live naked web woman cam community free live web amsterdam cam free live web cam free host live web free live pussy web cam asian cam free live web hot live free web cam cam free live now web cam female free live web cam free free live web amateur cam free live web xxx animal cam free live web cam free hidden live web cam free live preview web free live voyeur web cam cam ebony free live web cam free live password web cam free live shemale web free xxx web cam chat free web cam video chat cam chat free lesbian web cam chat free private web cam chat free program web cam chat free web cam chat free naked web cam chat free naughty web cam chat free web yahoo cam chat free totally web cam chat free software web cam chat free kid web cam chat free line web free amateur web cam and chat cam chat free free web cam chat college free web cam chat community free web cam chat free msn web best cam chat free web free porn web cam site free teen porn web cam cam com free porn web cam free online porn web free adult porn web cam cam free porn video web cam free porn web xxx free amateur porn web cam free gay porn web cam cam free porn watch web free xxx web cam site cam free teen web xxx free adult xxx web cam free amateur xxx web cam free teen web cam gallery cam free teen video web free gay teen web cam cam free site teen web cam free teen web young free amateur teen web cam free teen web cam picture free amateur web cam site free amateur adult web cam free gay amateur web cam free amateur web cam pic free sex cam free live sex cam free sex cam chat free live sex cam chat free sex video cam free sex spy cam free online sex cam free amateur sex cam free hidden sex cam free teen sex cam free adult sex cam free live sex chat web cam free gay sex cam cam com free live sex web free home sex cam free live teen sex cam free sex voyeur cam free lesbian sex cam free asian sex cam com cam free sex free private sex cam free sex cam site free nude sex cam free live sex video cam free sex cam sample free live web cam sex show adult cam chat free sex web free sex cam show anal cam free live sex sex cam chat free room sex web free live sex cam feed cam free home private sex web cam free movie sex cam free lesbian live sex amsterdam cam free sex cam free sex watch cam free livefeeds sex cam free latina sex free live sex cam show adult cam free live sex free hardcore sex cam amsterdam cam free live sex free couple sex cam free hot sex cam cam free membership no sex free porn sex cam free sex spy cam pic cam free gratis sex cam free live sex site web free streaming sex cam live sex voyeur cam for free girl web cam live web cam girl college girl web cam teen girl web cam hot web cam girl web cam girl pic young web cam girl cam chat girl web web cam girl picture black cam girl web asian girl web cam girl home web cam cam girl web yahoo girl personal web cam real web cam girl cam girl online web school girl web cam cam chat girl live web cam girl high school web web cam girl gallery cam girl video web cam girl hot live web cam girl little web cam college girl live web cam girl in web cam cam girl web cam girl horny web teenage girl web cam cam caught girl web web cam girl archive cam girl naughty web japanese girl web cam girl private web cam cam girl msn web cam girl photo web arab cam girl web cam cute girl web cam fat girl web cam girl indian web cam flashing girl web girl web cam site cam girl stripping web cam girl goth web cam girl watch web cam free girl streamate web cam dorm girl web cam girl girl web cam girl gratis web girl web cam adult cam flexing girl web cam free girl girl web cam girl gone web wild collage girl web cam cam girl korean web cam free girl view web alone cam girl home web cam canadian girl web cam girl russian web cam girl single web top 100 girl web cam teen girl web cam pic cam girl voyeur web cam girl home live web cam girl latina web cam french girl web cam girl secret web action cam girl web australian cam girl web cam girl strip web cam free girl preview web cam free girl horny web cam girl stripping teen web cam girl pic web young cam girl preteen web cam girl talk web cam girl index web cam girl kissing web cam girl local web cam girl teen web young web cam sex live sex web cam web cam sex chat teen sex web cam sex gratis web cam amateur web cam sex gay sex web cam live web cam sex chat adult sex web cam adult cam direct sex web web cam sex chat room video sex web cam sex web cam site home sex web cam web cam sex show cam online sex web live sex show web cam web cam cyber sex asian sex web cam web cam sex pic lesbian web cam sex hot sex web cam couple sex web cam cam college sex web cam sex web yahoo cam hidden sex web amsterdam cam sex web black sex web cam web cam sex com cam membership no sex web live adult sex web cam web cam sex gratuit cam pal pay sex web cam friend secret sex web adult cam chat sex web free sex porn web cam oral sex web cam cam having people sex web cam dating sex web cam live secretefriends sex web xxx sex web cam cam msn sex web nude sex web cam cam sex watch web cam cam free sex web group sex web cam cam sample sex web sex voyeur web cam cam couple live sex web com cam sex web free nude sex web cam
Bang Boat
Bang Boat
Bang Boat
Bang Boat

Posted by: Nick at July 26, 2004 12:40 PM | PERMALINK

you can play blackjack online here!
http://www.blackjack.greatnow.com

online casino

If you've ever been curious about how to play online poker then you'll want to read over the following online poker guide. This guide you should be in a god position to play poker.

Posted by: onine casinos at July 26, 2004 07:44 PM | PERMALINK

online casino

If you've ever been curious about how to play online poker then you'll want to read over the following. We suggest you try an online casino that offers free play in order to practice a bit before placing any real wagers. You can also play blackjack online fo free!

Posted by: online casino at July 30, 2004 06:55 PM | PERMALINK

1814 You can buy viagra from this site :http://www.ed.greatnow.com

Posted by: Viagra at August 7, 2004 10:20 PM | PERMALINK

1842 Why is Texas holdem so darn popular all the sudden?

http://www.texas-holdem.greatnow.com

Posted by: texas holdem at August 9, 2004 01:44 PM | PERMALINK

ok

Posted by: penis enlargement at August 10, 2004 09:09 AM | PERMALINK

5148 ok you can play online poker at this address : http://www.play-online-poker.greatnow.com

Posted by: online poker at August 10, 2004 10:34 AM | PERMALINK

2861 get cialis online from this site http://www.cialis.owns1.com

Posted by: cialis at August 11, 2004 02:05 AM | PERMALINK

904 Keep it up! Try Viagra once and youll see. http://viagra.levitra-i.com

Posted by: Viagra at August 13, 2004 09:40 PM | PERMALINK

5512 Get your online poker fix at http://www.onlinepoker-dot.com

Posted by: poker at August 15, 2004 02:07 PM | PERMALINK

6463 black jack is hot hot hot! get your blackjack at http://www.blackjack-dot.com

Posted by: blackjack at August 17, 2004 09:55 AM | PERMALINK

5416 so theres Krankenversicherung and then there is
Krankenversicherung private and dont forget
Krankenversicherung gesetzlich
and then again there is always beer

Posted by: Krankenversicherung private at August 17, 2004 09:15 PM | PERMALINK

8322 Its great to experiance the awesome power of debt consolidation so hury and consolidate debt through http://www.debtconsolidation.greatnow.com pronto

Posted by: debt consolidation at August 18, 2004 09:28 PM | PERMALINK

5004

http://www.exoticdvds.co.uk for
Adult DVD And Adult DVDS And Adult videos Thanks and dont forget Check out the diecast model
cars
at http://www.diecastdot.com

Posted by: Adult DVD at August 19, 2004 07:04 PM | PERMALINK

5191 check out the hot blackjack at http://www.blackjack-p.com here you can play blackjack online all you want! So everyone ~SMURKLE~

Posted by: blackjack at August 23, 2004 09:21 PM | PERMALINK

2091 Herie http://blaja.web-cialis.com is online for all your black jack needs. We also have your blackjack needs met as well ;-)

Posted by: blackjack at August 25, 2004 01:13 AM | PERMALINK

3989 check out http://texhold.levitra-i.com for texas hold em online action boodrow

Posted by: texas hold em at August 26, 2004 06:48 PM | PERMALINK
Navigation
Contribute to Calpundit



Advertising
Powered by
Movable Type 2.63

Site Meter