Contact
Archives
Search
Blogs
Newspaper Blogs
English-Language
Press
Polls

July 17, 2003

WHITE HOUSE IN "BATTLE MODE"....Man, the press is finally calling them the way they see them. This is from Friday's Washington Post:

Administration officials acknowledged yesterday that their damage control efforts over President Bush's use of tainted intelligence have been inadequate, and said they plan to put out additional facts in coming days.

....That would represent a change in tack. Bush's staff, during his campaign and in the White House, has typically handled controversies by trying to ignore them on the assumption that reporters and the public eventually would be distracted by other issues.

Sure, it's only on page A12, but it's a start! Read the whole story for more.

And prepare yourself for an epic blizzard of "additional facts" coming from the White House over the next few days. Should be fun.

Posted by Kevin Drum at July 17, 2003 10:07 PM | TrackBack


Comments

The White House yesterday sent Republicans on Capitol Hill a sheet of talking points titled "Why Saddam Hussein Was a Grave and Gathering Danger" and reprising evidence about the former Iraqi president's arsenal of weapons of mass destruction. "We are only beginning to uncover the truth about the Iraqi regime," the sheet says.

can't. . .respond. . .without blastfax!!!!

Posted by: edub at July 17, 2003 10:29 PM | PERMALINK

Rove: All hands to battle stations!
Tenet: Bite me.
Condi: No way, I've got a 5 o'clock on Fox to slag Tenet.
Powell: I've, um, got an appointment...
McClellan: I'm under my desk and not coming out.
Rummy: Pkshh! Kpow! Blam blam blam! Bshhh!
Ashcroft: Cover your ankles, you lascivious slut.

Posted by: squiddy at July 17, 2003 10:41 PM | PERMALINK

They're still promoting the same "evidence"?

They're like a smoker whose first action after losing a lung is taking a drag...

Posted by: Jonathan at July 17, 2003 10:41 PM | PERMALINK

Slightly OT, but it just occurred to me that the whole "only 16 words" excuse is a bit soft coming from the same people who didn't seem to mind that "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky" is only eleven words.

Posted by: Will Matthews at July 17, 2003 11:22 PM | PERMALINK

More damning evidence:

"During the Clinton administration, the CIA's annual reports to Congress on the global proliferation of weapons of mass destruction routinely cast Iraq as a problematic footnote -- a country worth keeping an eye on but not an alarming threat.

But the tone of the reports changed dramatically after George W. Bush became president, with increasingly longer narratives suggesting that Iraq was hell-bent on acquiring nuclear weapons.

In 1997, the first year of the congressionally mandated reports, the CIA devoted only three paragraphs to Iraq, noting that Baghdad possessed dual-use equipment that could be used for biological or chemical programs. There was no mention of a nuclear weapons program.

By last year, the latest reporting period, the section on Iraq ran seven times longer, warning that "all intelligence experts agree that Iraq is seeking nuclear weapons" and that the country could produce a bomb "within a year" if it got its hands on weapons-grade material.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told Congress last week that no significant new evidence about Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction had been uncovered during the current administration. Intelligence sources agreed.

The question of whether the CIA buckled under administration pressure as the White House prepared for war against Iraq has become even more sensitive in the wake of acrimonious finger-pointing on why Bush included in his State of the Union address an admittedly erroneous claim that Iraq had been shopping for uranium in Africa."

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-uscia0718,0,2936686.story?coll=ny-nationalnews-headlines

Posted by: nameless at July 17, 2003 11:25 PM | PERMALINK

"Additional facts" may be coming out of the White House, but heaven help you if you want to send any questions to the place.

"Under a system deployed on the White House Web site for the first time last week, those who want to send a message to President Bush must now navigate as many as nine Web pages and fill out a detailed form that starts by asking whether the message sender supports White House policy or differs with it."

Posted by: Linkmeister at July 17, 2003 11:29 PM | PERMALINK

Re: Nameless' post at 11:25. I have never heard this said explicitly, but if you think back to 2002, when the whole dirty Iraq snowball started rolling downhill. Does anyone remember how phony the whole thing felt back then? When the Bush administration started jabbering about Iraq in the summer of 2002, I remember being immediately suspicious about the whole thing. How did we go from Afghanistan and Osama Bin Laden to Iraq and Saddam Hussein? Mmmm...Bush, Texas, Iraq and yes oil. When we talk about our "national interest" we're talkin' crude. The black blood of our economy.
Now, is there any mystery as to how we have arrived where we are at today? For the eight years of the Clinton presidency, Iraq was not a major concern. From all the (lack of) evidence we have seen after the conclusion of the "major combat" there was good reason for this. There was no there (WMD) there. So why did we fight this war?
The next time someone says, "Its not about oil" tell 'em to shove some crude in a very crude place.

BTW. Once the Bush administration took over, we would have fought this war regardless of whether 9-11 happened or not.

Posted by: Another Bruce at July 18, 2003 12:42 AM | PERMALINK

On a tactical note, it has seemd to me that the Bush administration has not shown a knack for defense, in the few times they have had to go on the defensive, dating back to the arsenic in drinking water issue.

I think it is a truism that you can't be good at something you don't practice from time to time, and this is where the so far untroubled run of administration victories may prove to be a liability.

Posted by: etc. at July 18, 2003 01:39 AM | PERMALINK

Bruce--yes, I remember when this mess started, it felt pretty phony. At the time we started blowing Afghanistan, I was (reluctantly) in favor of the operation, because I bought in to all the goofy things Bush said at the time, and I was still freaked out about 9/11 (like most of us were).

By the way--oil is part of it, but this thing is bigger than even oil.

etc.--you're absolutely right. They're like the Rams from a few years ago--spectacular offense, terrible defense.

Their whole operation is collapsing like a house of cards, and they look like three monkey f***ing a football trying to figure out how to hang on.

Posted by: nota bene at July 18, 2003 02:00 AM | PERMALINK

Speaking of playing defense, have you seen what's up with Alabama AG Pryor's nomination vote?

Atrios' Lambert has it: http://www.waff.com/Global/story.asp?S=1365364

And the back story on the RAGA is even better. Check out Ignatz (sam Heldman) at
http://sheldman.blogspot.com

The money grafs from the WaPo article he links:

Republican state attorneys general in at least six states telephoned corporations or trade groups subject to lawsuits or regulations by their state governments to solicit hundreds of thousands of dollars in political contributions, according to internal fundraising documents obtained by The Washington Post.

One of the documents mentions potential state actions against health maintenance organizations and suggests the attorneys general should "start targeting the HMO's" for fundraising. It also cites a news article about consolidation and regulation of insurance firms and states that "this would be a natural area for us to focus on raising money."


So, apparently, Pryor was the founder of a group whose mission was to extort bribes from companies under review by the state.

Things are tough all over, eh boys?

Posted by: epist at July 18, 2003 02:12 AM | PERMALINK

"That would represent a change in tack."

They meant: "change of tactic."

Very sloppy. Very...uh...tacky.

Posted by: tristero at July 18, 2003 02:52 AM | PERMALINK

tristero:
tack -
Nautical.
To change the direction or course of a vessel: Stand by to tack.

Seems right to me. Whereas tactic implies one of many, tack implies an opposite approach, taking a whole new direction.

Posted by: theCoach at July 18, 2003 05:00 AM | PERMALINK

"By the way--oil is part of it, but this thing is bigger than even oil"

Oh, hell, if it was all about oil, I could accept it, up to a point--oil is a legitimate US interest; we can't afford to have the likes of Saddam mucking about with the world's oil supply (see 1991). But it's NOT about oil, exactly--it's more about crazy neocon theories and domestic politics (with maybe a lttle profiteering for GWB's buddies thrown in).

Posted by: rea at July 18, 2003 05:42 AM | PERMALINK

If they don't start pimping the "He tried to kill my dad" angle in this batch of fresh, piping-hot evidence, I'm going to be very disappointed. Even better: they unveil the gala musical number "He Tried To Kill My Dad", Broadway-style, in the Rose Garden.

Posted by: Norbizness at July 18, 2003 05:43 AM | PERMALINK

Whatever happened to the "responsibility era" that Bush pledged would begin with his presidency? So much for upholding the integrity of the office.

As uplifting as Blair's speech was, it doesn't detract from the emerging fact that the administration's case for war, in all its variations, was wholly fraudulent.

Posted by: Aaron W. Benson at July 18, 2003 06:08 AM | PERMALINK

>>And prepare yourself for an epic blizzard of "additional facts" coming from the White House over the next few days.

This should be fun - always useful to identify the operatives marching lockstep dutifuly and mindlessly repeating and disseminating the current talking points

Posted by: Andy at July 18, 2003 06:13 AM | PERMALINK

History is not going to absolve Tony Blair or George W. Bush over this matter of alledged Iraqi WMDs. Every day, week, and now month that nothing turns up further lowers their credibility, to the point where there will be hardly any left. Blair's lame attempt to change the rationale for the war is something he should be thrown out of office for, IMNSHO.

Posted by: David W. at July 18, 2003 06:20 AM | PERMALINK

If they don't start pimping the "He tried to kill my dad" angle in this batch of fresh, piping-hot evidence, I'm going to be very disappointed.

Agreed, Norbizness. The amazing thing about that fact is that it could have been used as part of a non-bogus case for war! Namely, if Saddam had succeeded in assassinating Bush the elder back in '93 or '94, whenever it was, there would have been a very good chance of a US war to topple his regime. And Saddam's fingerprints were all over the assassination attempt, he barely bothered to try to conceal it. So the point is, deterrence with Saddam is a pretty dicey proposition, because he was willing to take an enormous risk with his regime just to get some revenge of a purely personal nature. It doesn't prove that he was undeterrable, but it does raise serious questions about that. Ken Pollack pointed this out leading up to the war, and I thought, "That makes sense. Why didn't the administration ever say that? Oh, yeah, they went with 'he tried to kill my dad'...that's a much more convincing way to put it."

Posted by: Haggai at July 18, 2003 06:41 AM | PERMALINK

It's a front-page link on the web, along with a bunch of other stories. The (apparently) dead UK scientist who challenged Blair's dodgy dossier is only on TV today. They found a body. I'm not making this up.
Iraq seemed surreal when they started hyping it, but the entire US media bought the hype. That's actually - thanks for crystallizing it - the precise moment at which I decided that the US media had gone insane. We've been living the psychosis ever since, and now we may just wake up.
That monkey-football image is also one of the weirder metaphors I've ever seen, and I will be haunted by it. Silly monkeys.

Posted by: John Isbell at July 18, 2003 06:59 AM | PERMALINK

The Economist is running a very long-winded editorial about Iraq. They are trying hard to justify their support for the war and put the best face on the whole mess. Here's the link-

http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?story_id=1923421

Posted by: peter jung at July 18, 2003 07:00 AM | PERMALINK

That would represent a change in tack

One of the few people who uses that phrase properly. Most people make a change in tact. Kevin must be a sailor.

Posted by: Pug at July 18, 2003 07:08 AM | PERMALINK

Following up on its efforts to blow CIA ops' cover to discredit its critics, the White House is now outing a reporter as gay and...wait for it... Canadian!

Posted by: Sven at July 18, 2003 07:27 AM | PERMALINK

"One of the few people who uses that phrase properly. Most people make a change in tact. Kevin must be a sailor."

Look at the shoes, look at the shoes.

Posted by: jdw at July 18, 2003 07:30 AM | PERMALINK

theCoach:

"tack -
Nautical.
To change the direction or course of a vessel: Stand by to tack. "

Well...Actually that definition is for the intransitive verb form, but the reporter (not Kevin, btw) uses it as a noun.

Usually, when it's used as a noun I've seen it deployed thus: "That would represent an entirely new tack." The nautical metaphor is apt because in sailing, you "change tacks" when running before the wind, which is a complete change of direction, as part of a strategy to sail upwind via a "zig zag" course.

I 've never noticed the usage "a change in tack" used in sailing literature, which would imply some kind of a change within a given tack. That would be quite imprecise. To make such an adjustment, you'd either "trim" or "let out" your sails.

"Change of tack" could work, but considering that he drops the metaphor like a hot potato (pardon me!), I think the reporter meant either "a change in tactics" or "a change of tactic."

By the way, does anyone know if obsessive compulsive has a hyphen?

Posted by: tristero at July 18, 2003 07:39 AM | PERMALINK

It does.

Posted by: Mev at July 18, 2003 08:15 AM | PERMALINK

As a sailor myself, I admit that "change in tack" sounds odd, but I'd definitely know what someone was talking about. As an additional oddity, it is possible to change tacks without changing direction if the wind shifts significantly and suddenly. Ah, wouldn't it be nice if we could discuss politics exclusively in metaphors? :)

Posted by: Mev at July 18, 2003 08:18 AM | PERMALINK

More from the same WaPo article:

"People have been challenging the president's credibility for partisan political purposes," a senior administration official said. "There's nothing that gets this White House more in battle mode than that. We have no idea how long it will last."

Senate Majority Whip Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said on the Senate floor yesterday that Democrats had "sacrificed the national interest on the altar of partisan politics and are making accusations that are grossly offensive."

Interesting. Neither comment refutes the validity of the accusations ... the only claim is that the accusations are partisan and offensive.

Posted by: Gautam Vallabha at July 18, 2003 08:31 AM | PERMALINK

"Tack" is understatement.

It's more like JIBE JIBE JIBE! (Boom smacks Condi in the forehead) *splash*

Posted by: squiddy at July 18, 2003 08:43 AM | PERMALINK

The unambiguous use of the term is that a sailboat is on the "starboard tack" or "port tack" depending on which side of the midline the boom and mainsail are on. One of the main racing rules is that boats on starboard tack have right-of-way. The verb is intransitive and can refer to one change of tack, or a series. When sailboats are going to windward, they move most efficiently when they are pointed about 45 degrees off the direction of the wind, so a change of tack involves a 90 degree change in the direction in which the boat is moving. That's the source of the metaphor.

Posted by: Roger Bigod at July 18, 2003 09:00 AM | PERMALINK

"By the way--oil is part of it..."

CHENEY ENERGY TASK FORCE DOCUMENTS FEATURE MAP OF IRAQI OILFIELDS

http://www.judicialwatch.org/071703.b_PR.shtml

good ol' buzzflash

Posted by: d at July 18, 2003 09:03 AM | PERMALINK

This is the headline I want to see:

America tacks to port - details Skipper to Scupper

I'm no sailor - I get seasick.

Posted by: Aggrieved Pride at July 18, 2003 09:10 AM | PERMALINK

Wow, that Gay-or-Canadian story is appalling...but I love the "so-what" tone of the WP gossip column.

Other than that -- W's administration has had such an effect on me that I no longer particularly believe in SH's plot to kill Bush 41, and I used to.

Posted by: DonBoy at July 18, 2003 09:44 AM | PERMALINK

John--
I saw that story about Kelly too. This whole mess gets weirder by the minute. It's certainly unusual that that particular guy goes for a walk and doesn't come back this particular week. Now, before we get carried away, it seems from the article the guy was walking around in a park late at night, which is something he apparently liked to do. All the same....I'm going to go look for some Reynolds Wrap.

Josh Marshall suggests suicide, but then says "Even if that's what happened here though, when people at the center of scandals like this turn up dead it raises the drama level, the media fascination and 'heat' of the story almost immeasurably."

No kidding. Wonder if people are going to make Vince Foster comparisons?

Posted by: nota bene at July 18, 2003 09:46 AM | PERMALINK

Roger Bigod:

"so a change of tack involves a 90 degree change in the direction in which the boat is moving. That's the source of the metaphor."

Exactly and well put. Thanks.

Posted by: tristero at July 18, 2003 09:47 AM | PERMALINK

Ooh! The first "facts" are coming out! Apparently, a CIA intelligence assessment from October cites compelling evidence that Saddam was trying to reassemble a nuclear program. What a relief that Our Great Leaders weren't lying when they said so. Now the only problem is, why did the CIA believe something we now know to be false?

Posted by: Grumpy at July 18, 2003 10:59 AM | PERMALINK

Grumpy... the release said that Saddam might be able to get a nuke sometime in the next decade. Maybe the White House misread that to mean the next election?

Judical Watch just got the first set of papers they got from Cheney's Energy Commision. Guess what? Iraq is carved up nicely showing who would get which oil fields to exploit.

The plot thickens.

Posted by: M. L. Foster at July 18, 2003 01:33 PM | PERMALINK

The definition is... "A boat is on the tack, starboard or port, corresponding to her windward side."

Windward is defined: "A boat's leeward side is the side that is or, when she is head to wind, was away from the wind. However, when sailing by the lee or directly downwind, her leeward side is the side on which her mainsail lies. The other side is the windward side."

So, if you're backing your sail while close-hauled, your tack is defined by where the where the wind is coming from, not where the sail is.

Also, jibing is sometimes safer than tacking in certain conditions. :)

Posted by: Mev at July 18, 2003 01:37 PM | PERMALINK

Correction: the first AP bulletin said it was a CIA assessment. The CIA reference was deleted after I posted my remark. Minus that, I'd guess the conclusion comes from the OSP.

Posted by: Grumpy at July 18, 2003 02:55 PM | PERMALINK

Don't worry that other people don't know you; worry that you don't know other people.

Posted by: Blinn Anne Isacowitz at May 3, 2004 12:20 PM | PERMALINK

online casinos

Posted by: doi at May 24, 2004 06:56 AM | PERMALINK

Unusual ideas can make enemies.

Posted by: Fasano Luke at June 30, 2004 12:17 PM | PERMALINK


Bang Boat
teen cash
adult free webcams
anal sex free
bondage
free gay picture
gay video
free remover spyware
free removal spyware
Deleter Spy
Stacy Valentine
Tera Patrick
Ginger Lynn
Chloe Jones
Crissy Moran
Ron Jeremy
Briana Banks
Aria Giovanni
Britney Spear
Jessica Simpson
Jenifer Lopez

free web cam free live web cam free chat with web cam free sex web cam adult free web cam free nude web cam free girl web cam free web cam site free porn web cam free gay web cam free xxx web cam free teen web cam free web cam chat room free amateur web cam free web cam pic free adult live web cam free adult web cam chat live sex web cam free free personal web cam free live nude web cam free live girl web cam free live web cam chat web cam live free personal cam free view web free web cam picture free sex chat web cam free online web cam cam free viewing web free web cam software free lesbian web cam free web cam community cam free watch web free web cam video free live web cam site free web cam host free sexy web cam free web cam hosting free live web cam porn free naked web cam free web cam of woman free home web cam free live xxx web cam free adult web cam site free nude web cam chat cam free totally web cam free movie web cam chat free teen web free web cam chat site free asian web cam free black web cam voyeur web cam free free streaming web cam free web cam pussy free live teen web cam free web cam show free gay live web cam free private web cam cam free web yahoo web cam free ware cam chatting free web cam free gallery web free teen web cam pic free nude teen web cam free live web cam show free male web cam cam free live web woman cam free now web cam free membership no web cam college free web free live web cam amateur access cam free web cam dating free web free shemale web cam free sex web cam site cam free sample web cam download free web cam free room web cam free no registration web free adult web cam community free gay web cam chat cam chat free girl web cam free girl girl live web free hidden web cam free naked woman web cam free erotic web cam free hardcore web cam cam code display free web cam free mature web free web cam broadcast cam free preview web cam chat free online web free college girl web cam free live lesbian web cam cam free skin web free gay male web cam cam free man web free porn web cam chat cam free service web free nude woman web cam free web cam sex show free sex web cam video free adult sex web cam free online sex web cam free teen sex web cam free gay sex web cam free web cam sex amateur free private web cam sex home web cam sex free free web cam cyber sex free couple sex web cam free lesbian sex web cam free hardcore sex web cam cam free sex watch web free sex web cam pic cam free movie sex web cam free free sex web cam free sex view web free sex web cam sample free black sex web cam free nude web cam pic free amateur nude web cam cam free nude sexy web cam free non nude web free nude web cam site free adult nude web cam free nude man web cam free nude web cam show cam free live nude web woman free nude beach web cam free nude gay web cam free nude web cam at home free nude web cam picture cam free nude preview web cam free nude video web cam free girl hot web free web cam teen girl cam free girl pic web cam free girl online web black cam free girl web cam free girl watch web free adult girl web cam asian cam free girl web cam free girl video web cam free girl picture web cam free girl web young cam cam free free girl web web cam free girl totally web cam free girl show web cam free gallery girl web cam free girl real web cam free free girl web cam free live online web free live streaming web cam cam free live web free home live web cam cam free live secretfriends-com web cam free live totally web free live sexy web cam free live naked web cam cam free live watch web cam free live view web cam cam free free live web web cam feed free live web cam free live private web cam free live naked web woman cam community free live web amsterdam cam free live web cam free host live web free live pussy web cam asian cam free live web hot live free web cam cam free live now web cam female free live web cam free free live web amateur cam free live web xxx animal cam free live web cam free hidden live web cam free live preview web free live voyeur web cam cam ebony free live web cam free live password web cam free live shemale web free xxx web cam chat free web cam video chat cam chat free lesbian web cam chat free private web cam chat free program web cam chat free web cam chat free naked web cam chat free naughty web cam chat free web yahoo cam chat free totally web cam chat free software web cam chat free kid web cam chat free line web free amateur web cam and chat cam chat free free web cam chat college free web cam chat community free web cam chat free msn web best cam chat free web free porn web cam site free teen porn web cam cam com free porn web cam free online porn web free adult porn web cam cam free porn video web cam free porn web xxx free amateur porn web cam free gay porn web cam cam free porn watch web free xxx web cam site cam free teen web xxx free adult xxx web cam free amateur xxx web cam free teen web cam gallery cam free teen video web free gay teen web cam cam free site teen web cam free teen web young free amateur teen web cam free teen web cam picture free amateur web cam site free amateur adult web cam free gay amateur web cam free amateur web cam pic free sex cam free live sex cam free sex cam chat free live sex cam chat free sex video cam free sex spy cam free online sex cam free amateur sex cam free hidden sex cam free teen sex cam free adult sex cam free live sex chat web cam free gay sex cam cam com free live sex web free home sex cam free live teen sex cam free sex voyeur cam free lesbian sex cam free asian sex cam com cam free sex free private sex cam free sex cam site free nude sex cam free live sex video cam free sex cam sample free live web cam sex show adult cam chat free sex web free sex cam show anal cam free live sex sex cam chat free room sex web free live sex cam feed cam free home private sex web cam free movie sex cam free lesbian live sex amsterdam cam free sex cam free sex watch cam free livefeeds sex cam free latina sex free live sex cam show adult cam free live sex free hardcore sex cam amsterdam cam free live sex free couple sex cam free hot sex cam cam free membership no sex free porn sex cam free sex spy cam pic cam free gratis sex cam free live sex site web free streaming sex cam live sex voyeur cam for free girl web cam live web cam girl college girl web cam teen girl web cam hot web cam girl web cam girl pic young web cam girl cam chat girl web web cam girl picture black cam girl web asian girl web cam girl home web cam cam girl web yahoo girl personal web cam real web cam girl cam girl online web school girl web cam cam chat girl live web cam girl high school web web cam girl gallery cam girl video web cam girl hot live web cam girl little web cam college girl live web cam girl in web cam cam girl web cam girl horny web teenage girl web cam cam caught girl web web cam girl archive cam girl naughty web japanese girl web cam girl private web cam cam girl msn web cam girl photo web arab cam girl web cam cute girl web cam fat girl web cam girl indian web cam flashing girl web girl web cam site cam girl stripping web cam girl goth web cam girl watch web cam free girl streamate web cam dorm girl web cam girl girl web cam girl gratis web girl web cam adult cam flexing girl web cam free girl girl web cam girl gone web wild collage girl web cam cam girl korean web cam free girl view web alone cam girl home web cam canadian girl web cam girl russian web cam girl single web top 100 girl web cam teen girl web cam pic cam girl voyeur web cam girl home live web cam girl latina web cam french girl web cam girl secret web action cam girl web australian cam girl web cam girl strip web cam free girl preview web cam free girl horny web cam girl stripping teen web cam girl pic web young cam girl preteen web cam girl talk web cam girl index web cam girl kissing web cam girl local web cam girl teen web young web cam sex live sex web cam web cam sex chat teen sex web cam sex gratis web cam amateur web cam sex gay sex web cam live web cam sex chat adult sex web cam adult cam direct sex web web cam sex chat room video sex web cam sex web cam site home sex web cam web cam sex show cam online sex web live sex show web cam web cam cyber sex asian sex web cam web cam sex pic lesbian web cam sex hot sex web cam couple sex web cam cam college sex web cam sex web yahoo cam hidden sex web amsterdam cam sex web black sex web cam web cam sex com cam membership no sex web live adult sex web cam web cam sex gratuit cam pal pay sex web cam friend secret sex web adult cam chat sex web free sex porn web cam oral sex web cam cam having people sex web cam dating sex web cam live secretefriends sex web xxx sex web cam cam msn sex web nude sex web cam cam sex watch web cam cam free sex web group sex web cam cam sample sex web sex voyeur web cam cam couple live sex web com cam sex web free nude sex web cam
Bang Boat
Bang Boat
Bang Boat
Bang Boat

Posted by: Nick at July 26, 2004 12:28 PM | PERMALINK

1062 check out the hot blackjack at http://www.blackjack-p.com here you can play blackjack online all you want! So everyone ~SMURKLE~

Posted by: play blackjack at August 23, 2004 02:30 PM | PERMALINK

1378 Herie http://blaja.web-cialis.com is online for all your black jack needs. We also have your blackjack needs met as well ;-)

Posted by: blackjack at August 25, 2004 01:26 AM | PERMALINK
Navigation
Contribute to Calpundit



Advertising
Powered by
Movable Type 2.63

Site Meter